Browse the catalog below (search by name or vote key), or paste a vote account here if you already have one – same dashboard for every mainnet validator.
Names and stake come from the public Stakewiz catalog. Type at least two characters to match name or vote account; leave empty for top validators by stake.
Loading catalog…
Name
Vote account
Comm.
Stake (SOL)
Jito-capablei
Vote successi
Loading…
How to read this page
1 · Trust Card
A quick at-a-glance check: what fee they take, are they alive right now, and how steady their recent voting was.
2 · Stability score
The single most important number. Higher = fewer past delinquency events and fee changes in stored history. Use this first.
3 · Profitability & Pools
Estimated yield (from public APIs) and which staking pools delegate here. Useful context, not a guaranteed payout.
4 · Recent voting (chart + numbers)
Short-term, live read from RPC. Helpful for spotting recent changes; the Stability score above is still your primary signal.
5 · Duplex summaries Network read = network-relative band plus snapshot depth. Signal breakdown below rolls the same telemetry into positives/cautions for this validator – orthogonal scoring paths.
Tip · At a glance
Right under this box: the KPI row, then the network-relative summary, then profile details.
At a glanceKey numbers first; network-relative summary right below
Stability–
Commission–
Status–
Recent voting–
Jito–
APY est.–
Pools–
Network-relative read – how this validator compares on medians, live status, and snapshot depth tracked here.
Loading…Loading summary…
Summarizing tracked signals…
What do the colored labels mean?
Color bands group metrics tracked in this dashboard – snapshot depth plus stability, commission, and voting signals – so you can compare validators at a glance.
Lime = longer steady history here; mint = healthy signals but newer here; gray = chart still filling in; yellow = mixed or average vs network; orange = risk flag – read commission and stability above.
Validator profile
–
Loading…
–Jito: –
Loading context…
This page is tied to the vote in the URL. The backend records scheduled snapshots for all mainnet vote accounts; per-validator “how much history” still grows from the first day that account appears in storage.
Trust Card
Commission (validator fee)
i
–%
Lower is usually better for your net yield. 0% means the validator takes no fee here (pool/program fees may still apply). 100% is a stop sign for stakers – the validator keeps all rewards; delegators normally earn nothing.
Status (alive right now?)
i
–
Quick liveness check from RPC. Healthy is what you want; Delinquent means the validator is currently missing votes – combine with the Stability score before deciding.
Recent voting % (last few epochs)
i
–%
Average across the last few finished epochs. ~99 – 100% is great. Drops below ~90% in normal conditions deserve a closer look (could be temporary, but worth checking).
Last updated: –
Stability score (all-time snapshot history)
i
Snapshot-only block. Score reflects delinquency, commission changes, and commission level. 100% commission is treated as severe – stakers earn nothing even if the rate never changed. Coverage is network-wide; confidence still rises as more snapshots accumulate for this vote account over time.
–
/100
–
Primary scoring span: –
Loading…
–
How to use
This score reflects full stored history for this vote account (same pipeline as every other validator).
Higher is better for consistency (fewer delinquency events and fee changes).
New entries can look “early” until enough daily snapshots pile up – compare validators with similar history length when possible.
Use this as the main consistency signal; then check APY and pool context.
How to weigh things: start with the Stability score, double-check Commission and live Status for risk, then look at APY and pool presence for reward context. If two signals disagree, trust the long-term ones.
Estimated rewards & who else stakes here
i
APY ≈ approximate yearly yield (estimates from public APIs). Pools delegating = how many known staking pools (Marinade, Jito, etc.) trust this validator with stake.
Stakewiz APITrillium API
APY (blended estimate) i
–%
Stakewiz APY i
–%
Trillium APY i
–%
Pools delegating i
–
Stake breakdown
iTrillium API
Pool vs non-pool split uses Trillium API data. Hover the (i) icons for how to read each number.
Stake from known pools
i– SOL
Other / non-pool stake
i– SOL
Total in this split
i– SOL
Public API status: –
The two cards below = recent live behavior. Use them to confirm what the Stability score above already told you. If they disagree, prefer Stability (it’s based on stored history, not a few epochs).
Recent voting (last few epochs)
i
Each dot = one finished epoch. Higher is better (they voted on more of their slots). The active epoch is hidden while voting is still in progress.
Consistency %
Avg
– epochs
No epoch data yet
At a glance – recent epochs
i
Solana RPCStakewizTrilliumJito
How many recent epochs we can see i
–
–
Trend (getting better or worse) i
–
–
Steadiness between epochs i
–
–
Reward signals (Jito + APY estimates) i
–
–
Signal breakdown
i
Loading…
–
What looks good
Loading…
What to watch
Loading…
Confidence: –
Change history
i
Checking snapshot history…
Recorded changes
Pattern over tracking period
Epoch voting (live RPC)
Open another validator
Search by name below (e.g. “Coinbase”, “Marinade”), or paste a vote account. Optional name overrides the auto-detected display name in the new tab.
Tip: pick a row from the dropdown to auto-fill, or paste a raw vote account.
Compare on this page
Tip: Validator A is the currently opened validator on this page. Validator B is the vote account you pick or enter above.
Metric
Validator A
Validator B
Who looks better
This link saves your current view. If comparison is active, it also includes vote2 so others open the same A vs B comparison.
Roadmap
Direction – make every insight actionable for delegators (what to do next, not just charts),
then harden the same signals as open infrastructure so wallets, explorers, and teams can build on one transparent pipeline – not a one-off page.
Done: All-time snapshot-based stability scoring
Done: Validator comparison on the same page
Done: Full-network snapshot collection (scheduled; all vote accounts from RPC)
Done: Directory on home – search by name or vote key (open home)
Done: First-glance KPI strip + richer directory & pickers (context before you open a profile)
Done: Change history exports – copy summary and daily snapshot CSV